logo

Revising the History of al-Qa`ida’s original ,meeting with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi [Recurso electrónico] PDF

By: Material type: ArticleDescription: Recurso onlineSubject(s): Online resources: In: CTC Sentinel CTC Sentinel . -- Vol. 9 Issue 10 (Oct. 2016) p. 28-35Summary: In 2005, al-Qa`ida’s one-time security chief Saif al-`Adl chronicled a key period in the Islamic State’s origin story—the initial engagement between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Usama bin Ladin in 1999. His history, which describes al-Qa`ida agreeing to help al-Zarqawi establish a training camp near Herat without demanding al-Zarqawi swear allegiance to bin Ladin, is a seminal text in our understanding of the Islamic State’s history. But how reliable is the story? Even though most analysts believe the account was genuinely written by al-`Adl, bin Ladin was so unhappy with its contents he called it a fraud. And newly available jihadist documents suggest al-Qa`ida’s rationale for supporting al-Zarqawi was more complex and more Machiavellian than al-`Adl, or bin Ladin, ever admitted.
Item type: Analíticas
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Cover image Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Materials specified Vol info URL Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds Item hold queue priority Course reserves
Centro de Análisis y Prospectiva de la Guardia Civil Biblioteca Digital Available 2017320
Total holds: 0

In 2005, al-Qa`ida’s one-time security chief Saif al-`Adl
chronicled a key period in the Islamic State’s origin story—the
initial engagement between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
and Usama bin Ladin in 1999. His history, which describes
al-Qa`ida agreeing to help al-Zarqawi establish a
training camp near Herat without demanding al-Zarqawi
swear allegiance to bin Ladin, is a seminal text in our understanding
of the Islamic State’s history. But how reliable
is the story? Even though most analysts believe the
account was genuinely written by al-`Adl, bin Ladin was so
unhappy with its contents he called it a fraud. And newly
available jihadist documents suggest al-Qa`ida’s rationale
for supporting al-Zarqawi was more complex and more
Machiavellian than al-`Adl, or bin Ladin, ever admitted.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share