000			01792nab a22002057a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20150311100608.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_94942 _aCrosston, Matthew
245			_aPandora’s Presumption _h[Recurso electrónico] _b: Drones and the Problematic Ethics of Techno-War
520			_aPresent American policy proclaims the compatibility of drone usage with the traditional Rules of Engagement and the Laws of War. Largely absent in this is an examination of how enemy combatants are being defined on both sides of drone activity: not just the targets and operators but also the relevance of drone technology proliferation. This work engages the void to reveal inconsistent and contradictory ethical standards in American drone policy, based largely on an assumed continued technical preeminence that is by no means guaranteed. The argument is not a humanitarian lament against hegemony: it is a realist argument addressing how ethical inconsistencies in defining American technological warfare compromise the ‘leadership high ground’ for the United States in a manner that carries fairly significant national security blowback potential.
650		0	_94804 _aAviones no tripulados
650		0	_912755 _aDeontología
650		0	_98959 _aÉtica militar
650		0	_91175 _aÉtica policial
773	0		_6http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/?utm_source=scholarcommons.usf.edu%2Fjss%2Fvol7%2Fiss4%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages _aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 7 No. 4 (Special Issue: Winter 2014) Art. 3 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472
856	4		_uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1363&context=jss
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c15807 _d15810