000			01926nab a22001937a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20150311102849.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_912995 _a dos Reis Peron, Alcides Eduardo
245			_aThe “Surgical” Legitimacy of Drone Strikes? Issues of Sovereignty and Human Rights in the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems in Pakistan _h[Recurso electrónico]
520			_aThe Revolution in Military Affairs had an important role in providing the United States Armed Forces the technical instruments necessary to conduct high-risky operations in the context of Irregular Warfare. The development of these instruments, such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), allowed the emergence of a discourse of surgical and lean wars by the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations, whose legitimacy of the interventions were related to the accuracy and technical superiority of the UAVs. Focusing in the case of the U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan, this article seeks to debate the legal limits of the employment of these instruments. Despite the supposed accuracy and visual capacity of the UAVs, we argue that there are several information on the deaths of civilians, and legal limitations in the International Humanitarian Law, that constrain the employment of this instrument, and illegitimate the argument of surgical war.
650		0	_94804 _aAviones no tripulados
650		0	_91176 _aDerechos humanos
651		0	_91221 _aPakistán
773	0		_6http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/?utm_source=scholarcommons.usf.edu%2Fjss%2Fvol7%2Fiss4%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages _aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 7 No. 4 (Special Issue: Winter 2014) Art. 7 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472
856	4		_uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1392&context=jss
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c15812 _d15815