000			01744nab a22001817a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20150311103722.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_912997 _aFowler, Mike
245			_aThe Strategy of Drone Warfare _h[Recurso electrónico]
520			_aThere is a budding controversy with the combat use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). Also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), there is a growing literature critiquing the use of RPAs, often using the pejorative term “drone.” RPAs seem to get the blame for a variety of complaints about policy and employment that have little to do with the airframe or its processes. While all of the military functions of an RPA can and are done by manned aircraft, the RPAs must endure additional scrutiny. The decision to employ RPAs requires additional considerations at both the strategic and operational levels of war. This article explores the strategic issues that govern the decisions to employ RPAs in combat. The decision to employ RPAs involves a variety of strategic and operational concerns involving legal issues, technological constraints, operational efficiency, and an interdependency upon information operations.
650		0	_94804 _aAviones no tripulados
650		0	_912411 _aEstrategia militar
773	0		_6http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/?utm_source=scholarcommons.usf.edu%2Fjss%2Fvol7%2Fiss4%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages _aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 7 No. 4 (Special Issue: Winter 2014) Art. 9 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472
856	4		_uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=jss
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c15814 _d15817