000 01963nam a22001937a 4500
008 120307t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aES-MaBCA
_cES-MaBCA
100 _913366
_aSheppard, Ben
100 _913368
_aLiu, Brooke
100 _913367
_aJanoske, Melissa
245 _aUnderstanding Risk Communication Theory
_h[Recurso electrónico] PDF
_b: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators
_cNational Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
260 _bSTART
_cMay 2012
_aDepartment of Homeland Security Science and Technology Center of Excellence
300 _aRecurso online, 27 p.
520 _aThis document reflects the themes and concepts developed in the accompanying Understanding Risk Communication Best Practices: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators. This report discusses and dissects theories and models relevant to federal, state, and local homeland security personnel and emergency managers faced with communicating risks within their communities. It first provides a detailed discussion on defining risk communication, followed by risk characteristics to summarize how perceived dread and familiarity can affect risk messaging. Next, relevant theories and models1 are discussed in two parts: cross-cutting theories and models applicable across the preparedness, response, and recovery phases, and then additional theories and models that are most relevant within a specific event phase. As with the Best Practices document, many of the communication approaches presented were not originally designed for a specific event phase, but nevertheless offer valuable insights that make them particularly suitable for a specific event phase.
650 4 _9567
_aTeorías sobre seguridad.
_xSeguridad interior y exterior
650 0 _9973
_aSeguridad interior
856 4 _uhttp://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/files/publications/UnderstandingRiskCommunicationTheory.pdf
_qPDF
942 _2udc
_cBK
999 _c16498
_d16501