000 01850nab a22002297a 4500
003 ES-MaBCA
005 20150708110508.0
008 120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aES-MaBCA
_cES-MaBCA
100 _913454
_aKarlsson, Mikael
245 _aTTIP and the environment
_h[Recurso electrónico]
_b: the case of chemicals policy
520 _aAbstract: Disputes over trade and environment are not seldom superficial and the ongoing debate on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is not an exception. This article, however, seeks to provide an in-depth analysis in one of the areas being negotiated, namely chemicals management. It is shown that both policy and legislation in the area differ fundamentally between the EU and the USA, so neither harmonization of laws, nor harmonization of the implementation of laws is concluded to be plausible. Similarly, the prospects to harmonize the development of future chemicals legislation are concluded to be less than modest, and any institution for transatlantic regulatory collaboration in the area risks causing a regulatory chill effect at the expense of public health and the environment. The exception would be if US legislators would strengthen policy to the EU's higher level of precautionary protection, but such a policy change has for a long time proved impossible in the chemicals area.
650 0 _91197
_aRelaciones Internacionales
650 0 _91639
_aPolítica y gobierno
650 0 _91959
_aLegislación
650 0 _92738
_aMedio ambiente
651 0 _91574
_aPaíses de la Unión Europea
651 0 _91196
_aEstados Unidos de América
773 0 _aGlobal Affairs
_g. -- Vol. 1, No. 1 (2015), p. 21-31
_iEn :
_tGlobal Affairs
_w2014783
856 4 _uhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23340460.2015.977637#.VZpkOxvtlHw
942 _2udc
_cAN
999 _c16623
_d16626