000			01812nab a22001937a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20150708110730.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_913461 _aBiscop, Sven
245			_aThe state of defence in Europe _h[Recurso electrónico] _b: dependence, deterrence and deployment
520			_aAbstract: As the challenges in Europe's neighbourhood are multiplying, so its American ally's commitment is declining. Europe therefore has to decide which responsibilities it wants to assume as a security provider outside its borders, and translate that into capability targets that allow for it to act autonomously when necessary. The EU is best placed to express that ambition, through the European Council, and to detail its capability implications for expeditionary operations, which NATO can then integrate in overall capability targets for Europeans, including their collective defence obligations. The European Defence Agency is best placed to be the “architect” of cooperation to develop and acquire these priority capabilities together. Bringing these capabilities up to standard through manoeuvres is best done through the NATO command structure, of which Europe will avail itself in most scenarios demanding large scale, high intensity military intervention. Coordination, cooperation and eventually integration: those are the keys to building an affordable and coherent set of European forces.
610		0	_91645 _aUnión Europea
650		0	_91639 _aPolítica y gobierno
650		0	_91170 _aSeguridad y defensa
773	0		_aGlobal Affairs _g. -- Vol. 1, No. 2 (2015), p. 169-182 _iEn : _tGlobal Affairs _w2014783
856	4		_uhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23340460.2015.1034976#.VZzgXRvtlHw
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c16633 _d16636