000			01851nab a22001697a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20160201115440.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_94942 _aCrosston, Matthew
245			_aCultures, Conditions, and Cognitive Closure _h[Recurso electrónico] PDF _b: Breaking Intelligence Studies' Dependence on Security Studies
520			_aThis paper is about how the conceptualization of ‘culture’ in intelligence studies has taken on too powerful a role, one that has become too restrictive in its impact on thinking about other intelligence communities, especially non-Western ones. This restriction brings about unintentional cognitive closure that damages intelligence analysis. The argument leans heavily in many ways on the fine work of Desch and Johnston in the discipline of Security Studies, who cogently brought to light over fifteen years ago how ultra-popular cultural theories were best utilized as supplements to traditional realist approaches, but were not in fact capable of supplanting or replacing realist explanations entirely. The discipline of Intelligence Studies today needs a similar ‘intellectual intervention’ as it has almost unknowingly advanced in the post-Cold War era on the coattails of Security Studies but has largely failed to apply the same corrective measures. This effort may be best accomplished by going back to Snyder in the 1970s who warned that culture should be used as the explanation of last resort for Security Studies.
650		0	_91197 _aAnalisis de inteligencia
773	0		_aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 8 No. 3 (Special Issue: Fall 2015) Art. 2 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472
856	4		_uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1455&context=jss
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c17522 _d17525