000 02194nab a22002537a 4500
003 ES-MaBCA
005 20160914075152.0
008 120808t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a2334-3745
040 _cES-MaBCA
100 _914371
_aSmith, Benjamin
100 _914372
_aFigueroa-Caballero, Andrea
100 _914373
_aChan, Samantha
245 _aFraming Daesh
_h[Recurso electrónico] PDF
_b: failures and Consequences
_cSmith, Benjamin... [et al.]
260 _b Alex P. Schmid
_c2016
520 _aThe actual structures and motivations of terrorist organizations like Daesh (aka. IS, ISIS, ISIL) are often invisible to the general public, and given their clandestine nature, often opaque to all external actors (including governments, militaries, and others). For the general public, the ‘picture’ of terrorism and terrorist organizations is often painted by the media, with media framing having a direct influence on the American public’s understanding of the global terrorist threat, and in turn on the policies and actions the public expects and wants in response. We argue that the central disconnect between the preferences of the American public and the actions of the current administration – a disconnect that we argue did not exist in relation to al Qaeda – can in part be explained by media framing of Daesh. We compare media representations of Daesh, and al Qaeda, with a specific focus on the time period between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 and find that Daesh has been framed as an existential threat, derivative of its framing as a singularly motivated militaristic group. Because of this framing, there is an inherent disconnect between public perceptions of the threat posed by Daesh and the response to Daesh being pursued by the Administration
610 0 _912870
_aEstado Islámico
610 0 _91729
_aAl Qaeda
650 0 _91735
_aTerrorismo
650 0 _94151
_aMedios de comunicación social
773 0 _aPerspectives on Terrorism
_g. -- Vol. 10 No. 4 (Aug. 2016) 11 p.
_iEn :
_tPerspectives on Terrorism
_w1101
_x2334-3745
856 4 _qPDF
_uhttp://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/526/1039
942 _2udc
_cAN
999 _c18550
_d18553