000			02098nab a22002177a 4500
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20170117124408.0
008			120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_914523 _aAndrews Fearon, Patricia
245			_aComplexity Under Stress _h[Recurso electrónico] PDF _b: Integrative Approaches to Overdetermined Vulnerabilities
520			_aOver four decades of cognitive complexity research demonstrate that higher integrative complexity (measured by the ability to differentiate and integrate multiple dimensions or perspectives on an issue) predicts more lasting, peaceful solutions to conflict. Interventions that seek to raise integrative complexity offer a promising approach to preventing various forms of intergroup conflict (e.g. sectarianism, violent extremism). However, these contexts can also be extremely stressful, and dominant theory suggests that cognitive complexity diminishes in the face of high stress. However, we know that this is not always the case, with some findings demonstrating the opposite pattern: increases in complexity under high stress. How is it that some people in the midst of stressful conflict are able to recognize multiple perspectives and solutions, while others become increasingly narrow and rigid in their thinking? The aim of this paper is to integrate these divergent findings through the broader framework of the biopsychosocial model of stress and to explore possible underlying mechanisms such as affect. Implications for intervention will also be discussed.
650		0	_914525 _aRecurso cognitivo
650		0	_914526 _aEstrés
650		0	_99344 _aResolución de Problemas.
650		0	_91755 _aGestión de crisis
650		0	_91899 _aSeguridad _xPsicología
773	0		_aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 9 No. 4 (Special Issue Winter 2016: Understanding and Resolving Complex Strategic Security Issues) Art. 3 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472
856	4		_uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1557&context=jss
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c19018 _d19021