| 000 | 01687nab a22002057a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-MaBCA | ||
| 005 | 20170228105936.0 | ||
| 008 | 130527b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2386-9453 | ||
| 040 |
_aSpMaBN _bEspañol _cSpMaBN |
||
| 100 |
_914599 _aBirben, Burçak |
||
| 245 |
_aEU Autonomous Sanctions _h[Recurso electronico] PDF _b: Igniting a Passive Revolution? |
||
| 520 | _aThis article2 intends to explore why there has been an increase in the imposition of EU autonomous sanctions in the last decade although they are accepted ‘ineffective’. Based on the coercive nature of sanctions within the areas of International Relations and International Political Economy, the emphasis has been put on a historical materialist approach, which advocates that the relationship between market intentions and political culture of sanctions is not necessarily deterministic, but rather dialectical. To understand to what extent market intentions play role in this strike, the multidisciplinary theory of Neo-Gramscianism is chosen to conduct an empirical analysis of case comparison. The concept of ‘hegemony’ that the relevant theory has brought forward, has motivated a research on how the EU utilizes autonomous sanctions as an instrument to obtain its political and cultural hegemony. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_94193 _aPolítica económica |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_94823 _aDerecho internacional |
|
| 651 | 0 |
_91574 _aPaíses de la Unión Europea |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_aUNISCI Discussion Papers _g. -- N. 43 (enero 2017) p. 35-52 _iEn : _tUNISCI Discussion Papers _w3323 _x2386-9453 |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttps://www.ucm.es/data/cont/media/www/pag-72408//UNISCIDP43-NUMEROENTERO.pdf | |
| 942 |
_2udc _cAN |
||
| 999 |
_c19132 _d19135 |
||