000 01687nab a22002057a 4500
003 ES-MaBCA
005 20170228105936.0
008 130527b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a2386-9453
040 _aSpMaBN
_bEspañol
_cSpMaBN
100 _914599
_aBirben, Burçak
245 _aEU Autonomous Sanctions
_h[Recurso electronico] PDF
_b: Igniting a Passive Revolution?
520 _aThis article2 intends to explore why there has been an increase in the imposition of EU autonomous sanctions in the last decade although they are accepted ‘ineffective’. Based on the coercive nature of sanctions within the areas of International Relations and International Political Economy, the emphasis has been put on a historical materialist approach, which advocates that the relationship between market intentions and political culture of sanctions is not necessarily deterministic, but rather dialectical. To understand to what extent market intentions play role in this strike, the multidisciplinary theory of Neo-Gramscianism is chosen to conduct an empirical analysis of case comparison. The concept of ‘hegemony’ that the relevant theory has brought forward, has motivated a research on how the EU utilizes autonomous sanctions as an instrument to obtain its political and cultural hegemony.
650 0 _94193
_aPolítica económica
650 0 _94823
_aDerecho internacional
651 0 _91574
_aPaíses de la Unión Europea
773 0 _aUNISCI Discussion Papers
_g. -- N. 43 (enero 2017) p. 35-52
_iEn :
_tUNISCI Discussion Papers
_w3323
_x2386-9453
856 4 _uhttps://www.ucm.es/data/cont/media/www/pag-72408//UNISCIDP43-NUMEROENTERO.pdf
942 _2udc
_cAN
999 _c19132
_d19135