000			01954nab a22001817a 4500
005			20170420103818.0
008			120229t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_914768 _aBailey, Gavin
100			_914769 _aEdwards, Phil
245			_aRethinking 'Radicalisation' _h[Recurso electrónico] PDF _b: Microradicalisations and Reciprocal Radicalisation as an Intertwined Process
300			_aRecurso online, 27 p.
520			_aThis paper proposes a rethinking of ‘radicalisation’ as a process with no definite beginning or inevitable end-point. Reflecting on empirical research which engaged with radical Islamist and far-right activists and supporters, it argues that we should not focus the concept of radicalisation on the moment in which an individual or group moves from legal to illegal activity, or from non-violent to violent, as this is only one part of a longer journey. Thus, the term radicalisation should encompass any movements towards greater conflict, both commonplace and rare, small and large, driven by a potentially infinite range of motives, encompassing all political outlooks, and made by individuals, groups, societies and states. Using this conceptualisation instead allows us to examine how small conflicts escalate through ‘reciprocal radicalisation’, and how big radicalisations arise from microradicalisations. This, we argue, provides a more equitable basis for policy and practice that aims to avoid, prevent or combat the most problematic radicalisations, or otherwise resolve political conflict. To achieve this, however, also means not hyping everyday radicalisations into a threat to the existence of the nation state.
650		0	_95470 _aRadicalismo
773	0		_aJournal for Deradicalization _g. -- Vol. 10 (Spring 2017) p. 255-281 _iEn : _tJournal for Deradicalization _w2017890
856	4		_uhttp://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/92/81 _qPDF
942			_2udc _cAN
999			_c19528 _d19531