000 01830nam a22002417a 4500
003 ES-MaBCA
005 20180802101614.0
008 130520b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cES-MaBCA
100 _913870
_aGemmerli, Tobias
245 _aFailure to define killer robots means failure to regulate them
_h[Recurso electrónico] PDF
_b: States disagree on definition of lethal autonomous weapons
_cDIIS POLICY
260 _bDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS)
_cFebrero 2018
_aØstbanegade 117, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
300 _aRecurso online, 4 p.
_g1738 KB
490 _aDIIS Policy Brief
_v(Febrero 2018)
500 _aDisagreements on how to define “autonomy” are stalling formal UN discussions on the compliance of autonomous weapons with international humanitarian law. A pragmatic approach that focuses on the weapon’s critical functions, such as target selection and firing, can help move discussions forward in the future.
520 _aThis brief examines some of the different interpretations of radicalization, ideas on why people become radicalized and theories on how people become radicalized. A key argument of the author is that there is no consensus on the definition of the concept of radicalization and that this has serious consequences for counter-radicalization initiatives. In light of this, the author also provides recommendations on how to develop a clearer definition of radicalization as well as how to better use the concept.
650 0 _91254
_aArmas
650 0 _914574
_aRobots
650 0 _91698
_aSeguridad en las Tecnologías
710 _95315
_aDanish Institute for International Studies
856 4 _uhttp://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/1358230/Failure_to_define_killer_robots_means_failure_to_regulate_them.pdf
_q*DESCARGAR PDF*
942 _2udc
_cART
999 _c21118
_d21121