000			02234nam a22002777a 4500
999			_c21788 _d21791
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20190201103951.0
008			150225b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a978-92-846-4340-0
024			_2doi _a10.2861/146500
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
100			_915772 _aMaître Frédéric, MAURO
245			_aStudy EU Defence _b: The White Book implementation process
260			_bPolicy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies _cDecember 2018
300			_a99 p. _fRecurso online
490			_aIn-Depth Analysis _vPE 603.871
520			_aThe question of a defence White Book at European level has been under discussion for some time. Many voices, particularly in the European Parliament, are pushing for such an initiative, while others consider that it is not only unnecessary, but could even dangerously divide Europeans. Concretely, the question cannot be tackled separately from that of defence planning and processes which underpin the development of military capabilities, as White Books are often the starting point for these. Within the European Union, however, there is not just one, but three types defence planning: the national planning of each of the Member States; planning within the framework of NATO (the NATO Defence Planning Process) and, finally, the European Union’s planning, which has developed in stages since the Helsinki summit of 1999 and comprises many elements. Its best-known component - but by no means not the only one - is the capability development plan established by the European Defence Agency. How do all these different planning systems coexist? What are their strengths and weaknesses? Answering these preliminary questions is essential in mapping the path to a White Book. This is what this study sets out to do.
610		0	_91645 _aUnión Europea
650		0	_9913 _aDefensa nacional
651		0	_91574 _aPaíses de la Unión Europea
710			_92428 _aParlamento Europeo
856	4		_uhttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603871/EXPO_STU(2018)603871_EN.pdf _y *DESCARGAR PDF*
942			_2udc _cAN _kBoletín UE _mdecember 2018