000			01826nam a22002177a 4500
999			_c22744 _d22747
003			ES-MaBCA
005			20200120120552.0
008			150225b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA
245			_aFreedom of expression, a comparative-law perspective _cUnidad Biblioteca de Derecho Comparado _b: The United Kingdom
260			_bEuropean Parliamentary Research Service _coctober 2018
300			_a62 p. _fRecurso online _c551 KB
490			_aBriefing
520			_aThis study forms part of a wider-ranging project which seeks to lay the groundwork for comparisons between legal frameworks governing freedom of expression in different legal systems. The following pages will analyse, with reference to the United Kingdom and the subject at hand, the legislation in force, the most relevant case law and the concept of freedom of expression with its current and prospective limits, ending with some conclusions and possible solutions for future challenges. In the absence of formal constitutional protection for freedom of expression, the approach of the UK is residual in nature. That is to say, the extent of a person’s freedom of expression is what is left after statutory and common law (judge-made) incursions into the freedom. Notwithstanding the passage of the Human Rights Act 1998, it remains the case that the UK Parliament is free to modify and restrict freedom of expression.
650		0	_916200 _aLibertad de expresión
650		0	_916290 _aDerecho comparado
651		0	_91411 _aReino Unido
710			_912899 _aParlamento Europeo _b. Servicio de Investigación Parlamentario Europeo
856	4		_uhttps://biblioteca.guardiacivil.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=5b4f4668daeb9cf4bfb1b31344d3a5d3 _y *DESCARGAR PDF*
942			_2udc _cART _kBoletín UE _moctober 2019